Posted

Below are a list of mirrored study PDF’s from early UBI studies.

https://ubi.earth/studies/sustainable_commons.mp4
https://ubi.earth/studies/marinescu_RI-No-Strings-Attached-201705.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/good_for_women_ubi.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/zimbabwe.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/india.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/unicef_mythbusting.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/lebanon.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/kuwait.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/manitoba.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/declining_job_quality_in_the_us.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/wordbank_temptationgoods.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/odi_cashtransfers.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/fao_unicef.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/women_ubi_lhirondelle.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/precarious_work_in_the_republic_of_ireland_july_19_final.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/india2.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/alaska.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/kenya.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/usa_cash_transfers.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/namibia.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/zambia.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/odi.pdf
https://ubi.earth/studies/harvard.pdf

Author

Posted

An experienced entrepreneur knows what it takes to create jobs and has their pulse on HR trends. They know that you can’t just create any job without building a business cycle first. Real entrepreneurs want to create a profitable business to the point where it can hire, train, and support careers long-term. They have a sense of how microeconomics affects macroeconomics, and vice versa. Social entrepreneurs are a rare group that focus on social good and want to change the world for the better.
But what if the entrepreneurial world is changing? What if the incentives for creating long-term work are no longer there, as employers opt instead for temporary gig workers and software automations? What if automation, AI, and temp-work begin to outpace career creation, adding to the already downward trends of poverty, inequality, and unemployment? 
These concerns are the focal points for presidential candidate Andrew Yang, where his campaign faces the potentially grim economic reality of massive job loss that may be caused by automation and job replacement. Yang’s platform addresses these concerns with genuine solutions. 
“In the next 12 years, 1 out of 3 American workers are at risk of losing their jobs to new technologies—and unlike with previous waves of automation, this time new jobs will not appear quickly enough in large enough numbers to make up for it.”
“I am passionate about our need to evolve because I am convinced that we are automating away the most common jobs in our country, and we must adapt.”
Yang’s belief is partially backed by a 2016 White House economic report implying that jobs that pay less than $20 per hour have an 83% probability of being automated: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/ERP_2016_Chapter_5.pdf
Andrew Yang’s entrepreneurial experience and insight will play crucial roles in adapting to a fast-changing American economy, and his success in his entrepreneurial background sets him apart from the other candidates.
Instead of adapting the economy with a federal job guarantee where the government manages a job for every person who doesn’t already have one, Yang proposes something much more streamlined: A cash payment of $1000 every month distributed to every adult American citizen. This idea is part of a larger concept called Universal Basic Income, or UBI.
UBI is the flagship of his campaign and it is called “The Freedom Dividend”. For anyone that is paying attention to the gamut of problems we need to tackle, this would be a crucial step forward at a critical moment in an America that’s grappling with a barrage of serious issues, including this impending wave of technological displacement.
Yang’s insight stems from his real-world social entrepreneurial experiences creating a non-profit called Venture for America. At VFA, college graduates apply to become fellows, trained in startups, web design, entrepreneurship, and public speaking programs in Detroit. Students are then placed in startups in various cities such as Baltimore, Detroit, and San Antonio. VFA created a startup accelerator and grew to 20 cities with an operating budget of $6 million.

In 2012 Yang was also designated a “Presidential Ambassador for Global Entrepreneurship” and a “Champion of Change” by the Obama Administration. “Celebrating a Year of Champions of Change – President Obama Meets with 12 Champions Who Are Making a Difference in Their Communities”
Those studying economics and/or have entrepreneurial experience understand the high levels of risk involved in starting a business and the necessity of innovating to break into the market.
With the Freedom Dividend, risk would be reduced and innovation would be boosted as previous studies done to test UBI have shown. In India, for example, entrepreneurship was boosted: “basic income grants led to small-scale investments — more and better seeds, sewing machines, establishment of little shops, repairs to equipment…” https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/17702/1/India’s%20experiment.pdf —A large portion of this cash would then be cycled back into the economy through consumer spending. This cycle fosters an environment for entrepreneurialism and from that comes job growth. 
“A basic income can provide seed capital for individuals to purchase materials and assets needed to start their own enterprises and become entrepreneurs.” https://munkschool.utoronto.ca/mowatcentre/wp-content/uploads/publications/126_pilot_lessons.pdf — A Freedom Dividend would reduce “the risk they face should they decide to become entrepreneurs.”
UBI has demonstrated positive economic change beyond innovation and startups. UBI has the potential to change the incentives for entrepreneurial projects and to steer the incentives more towards social entrepreneurship. In a 2017 report exploring the impact of basic income on social entrepreneurship, it was stated that “social businesses create 126 jobs for every 94 jobs that a regular business creates.” https://munkschool.utoronto.ca/mowatcentre/wp-content/uploads/publications/148_basic_impact.pdf 
Looking beyond traditional job creation, forward thinkers like Andrew Yang realize that the American economy should also create better, and more meaningful socially-conscious jobs. In the face of automation, AI, and technological displacement, the Freedom Dividend as a UBI program for American citizens would be an incredibly positive change for our society that would create more socially-conscious jobs.
By putting Universal Basic Income at the forefront of his campaign, Andrew Yang displays his own entrepreneurial understanding in that we must prepare for an economy that is poised to significantly transform in the coming years, and face those challenges head-on by shifting toward a more socially-conscious form of Capitalism where everyone has a foundational income floor.

Author

Posted

One of the candidates running for President, Andrew Yang, is proposing to ensure everyone $1000 per month, called a Freedom Dividend. 
There are a wide variety of ways that a Freedom Dividend would empower women and strengthen entire communities: by reducing domestic violence and financial abuse by partners, by solving parenting issues and acknowledging care-work, by improving education, improving nutrition, and creating stronger relationships, among other positive impacts.
One of the most impactful ways a Freedom Dividend would make a difference is through empowering those who are victims of domestic violence and financial abuse. 
When I was in college I met a woman who needed some help. She explained to me that she was being beaten, abused, and wanted to escape. She told me the number one thing she needed was money to escape her situation, and the second was transport. I explained she could use the school’s library internet to setup a PayPal account and receive money from relatives or friends no matter where they live. She didn’t know what PayPal was, but she did follow the suggestions… and she escaped her abuser. 
But others are not that lucky to have a financial support group. Money is crucial to freedom for a victim of financial abuse because they are being economically oppressed. Financial abuse is when the abuser controls the victim’s ability to acquire and use money. According to a Centers for Financial Security study, “financial abuse occurs in 99% of domestic violence cases” https://centerforfinancialsecurity.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/adams2011.pdf
This is why the Freedom Dividend would be impactful by providing an escape route for anyone stuck in abusive relationships. “Look at the statistics on domestic violence- financial dependency is one of the ways abusers control their victims. With a Basic Income tied to them, victims have more freedom to escape.” https://women4ubi.wordpress.com/ — @Women4UBI
Beyond that powerful impact, the Freedom Dividend will ensure economic empowerment of women through the financial freedom to seek better economic opportunities, get training, apply for work, or even start new business ventures.
There would be more room for the freedom of creativity and risk-taking ventures.
That’s exactly what has happened in UBI studies. In the experiment in India, women were some of the recipients that started new businesses and risk-taking ventures, often leading to the start of economic independence: “Women’s empowerment was one of the more important outcomes of this experiment” http://www.unicef.in/Uploads/Publications/Resources/pub_doc83.pdf
In similar UBI-like programs in Zimbabwe, cash-transfers led to increased economic activity and more social cohesion http://www.cashlearning.org/downloads/skovdal-et-al-2013—-ct-and-social-acceptability.pdf
“the programme had enabled them to set up small scale income generating activities, transforming their livelihoods by strengthening household assets.” 
“The programme was said to address social inequalities creating more unified and socially cohesive community contexts.”
In Zambia and India it was shown that cash-transfers increased economic activity and productivity. https://ubi.earth/ubi-research
“When peoples basic, fundamental needs are met, when they are not working for survival, they are able to do more with their lives. One of the areas where UBI would shine is allowing women to pursue their own financial ventures.”  https://women4ubi.wordpress.com/
Additionally, the Freedom Dividend would make a significant impact in acknowledging and paying for care work.
It would acknowledge at-home care work such as raising a child, and supporting elder or disabled care.
“the market system insists that mothers are not economically productive members of society, and, therefore, they do not get paid a salary.” https://www.livableincome.org/awhywomen.htm
“Basic income recognizes and compensates unpaid caregivers of all types, and at all levels. It acknowledges that caregiving is real work, even if it isn’t “paid employment”. Right now, caregivers are actively excluded from most social benefits. That needs to change.” https://women4ubi.wordpress.com/ — @Women4UBI
The Freedom Dividend acknowledges the work of single at home mothers.
Women will have more freedom when it comes to deciding on having a child or not.
They will also have more freedom when it comes to parenting.
Increasingly in an economy that begins to favor gig-work and temp-work, couples living in a household are both required to spend the time to obtain a stable income. Sometimes more than one job. That means little to no time to stay at home caring for a child, effectively spending more money on childcare and more time spent at work, away from their children.
Paying for time for better parenting is economic empowerment and that extra time spent with children is setting a good example for them. This means better physical and mental health for children, better schooling, and more chance of keeping children out of trouble—all with long-term benefits for both the parents and their children.
There have been cash-transfer studies in the USA that show “a significant increase in other quality-of-life benefits (mental and physical health, education outcomes, parenting, reduced criminal activity, etc.).” http://www.marinescu.eu/Marinescu_UBI_review_2017.pdf
“School attendance, grades, and test scores for the children of negative income tax recipients were typically higher than the control population, especially for younger and poorer children.”
“an improvement in parenting likely contributed to improved child outcomes among families receiving the payments”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322665448_Behavioral_Effects_of_a_Cash_Transfer_Evidence_from_the_World’s_Only_Continuous_Universal_Income_Program
Beyond better schooling and generally providing a healthier environment to raise children, the Freedom Dividend will help parents pay for better nutrition for themselves and their children. 
In the Unicef study in India it was found that “productive assets increased income which increased access to nutrition” 
“Interestingly, the improvement in z-scores for girls was higher in SEWA villages suggesting that having a voice organization for women can heighten the impact that basic income transfers can have on nutritional outcomes, particularly that of girls.”
http://www.unicef.in/Uploads/Publications/Resources/pub_doc83.pdf
The cash-transfers “showed positive impacts on the quality of nutrition”.
A variety of UBI studies are available for anyone to read that show examples of what a Freedom Dividend would do for women and how that can be applied here in America with the Freedom Dividend.
Ensuring women have cash to spend when they need it would empower and strengthen entire communities. It would reduce domestic violence and financial abuse and provide a means to escape abusive situations. It would significantly improve parenting, educational outcomes, and would acknowledge care-work. It would create a better more cohesive community, it would create stronger relationships and lead to less crime, and it would prepare healthier children that are ready to take on a challenging future.

Author

Posted


India
“Women’s empowerment was one of the more important outcomes of this experiment” 
“Contrary to the skeptics, the grants led to more labor and work (figure 2).” * 
“The positive effect on production and growth means that the elasticity of supply would offset inflationary pressure” 
“Those with basic income were more likely to reduce debt and less likely to go into greater debt.” 
http://globaldialogue.isa-sociology.org/indias-great-experiment-the-transformative-potential-of-basic-income-grants/
http://www.unicef.in/Uploads/Publications/Resources/pub_doc83.pdf

Namibia
“Overall crime rates – as reported to the local police station – fell by 42% while stock theft fell by 43% and other theft by nearly 20%.” 
“Before the pilot project started, opponents said that if you give people money, and especially poor people, they will sit down and become lazy. […] The results of the research presented here, refute this claim.” – “I am convinced that the BIG is not only able to eradicate destitution, hunger and malnutrition, but that it lays a strong foundation for economic empowerment, responsibility and ownership taking. The BIG, by restoring the human dignity of people, frees people to become active and proud members of this society.”
http://bignam.org/Publications/BIG_Assessment_report_08b.pdf

Alaska
“businesses compete for a share of the dividend dollars through advertising campaigns, sales, and other types of special offers.” 
“This has allowed the state to eliminate most taxes except those on petroleum, to expand public services…” 
“demand for public as well as non-profit programs providing services for lower-income individuals and families has also been growing rapidly.” 
“Alaska has experienced lower levels of inflation compared to the U.S. average since the inception of the program.” 
“Alaska is consistently among the most equal of all US states, with the lowest rates of poverty, and the highest Well-Being Index scores.”
http://ubi.earth/studies/alaska.pdf

USA
“The evidence does not suggest an average worker will drop out of the labor force when provided with unconditional cash, even when the transfer is large.”
“School attendance, grades, and test scores for the children of negative income tax recipients were typically higher than the control population, especially for younger and poorer children.”
Children also reported more positive interactions with parents.” “payments also caused a reduction in drug-dealing activities among youths.”
“This demand stimulation effect would contribute to increasing employment and wages.”
“an improvement in parenting likely contributed to improved child outcomes among families receiving the payments”
“The positive effect of the payments on psychiatric disorders in young adulthood was larger for children who were younger when the payments started.”
“find that income has a pervasive positive effect on health, with important reductions in smoking, obesity, and anxiety. “
http://www.marinescu.eu/Marinescu_UBI_review_2017.pdf

Lebanon
“When people receive cash grants they invest the money or spend it on such basic items as food and better shelter.” 
“Cash grants do not cause inflation and do produce significant benefits for local economies. The research found that there are no inflationary impacts from cash distributions.” 
“proven to be an effective form of aid for reducing poverty. Direct cash assistance is inexpensive to administer and allows recipients to buy what they want and need, rather than what experts think they need.”
“Fears that cash recipients consistently waste the funds they are given are simply not supported by the available data” 
“Research shows that when recipients can invest their cash grants in job-skills training and starting small businesses, cash grants help poor recipients create long-term income sources.” 
“Families that received cash faced fewer verbal and physical conflicts” 
“The research found that the cash program did not increase the number of refugees moving to regions with the cash program.”
https://website.aub.edu.lb/ifi/publications/Documents/policy_memos/2015-2016/20160225_impact_cash_assistance.pdf

Zimbabwe
“the community has become more unified, with everyone interacting well with each other across social strata. “It brought more social cohesion because some people used to suffer on their own. They did not socialize with other people because they [didn’t have a foundational income floor] but with the coming of the programme everyone is working together, people are now interacting with everyone.” Florence, female community member” 
“It brought more cohesion because some people used to suffer on their own. They did not socialize with other people because they were poor but with the coming of the programme everyone is working together, people are now interacting with everyone.” Florence, female, community member” 
“the programme had enabled them to set up small scale income generating activities, transforming their livelihoods by strengthening household assets.” 
“The programme was said to address social inequalities creating more unified and socially cohesive community contexts”
http://www.cashlearning.org/downloads/skovdal-et-al-2013—-ct-and-social-acceptability.pdf

Latin America, Africa, Asia
“on average, there is no increase in the consumption of temptation goods.” 
“There is clear evidence that transfers are not consistently used for alcohol or tobacco in any of these environments.” 
“strong evidence that concerns that transfers will be used on alcohol and tobacco are unfounded.”
“This paper reviews 19 studies with quantitative evidence on the impact of cash transfers on temptation goods, as well as 11 studies that surveyed the number of respondents who reported they used transfers for temptation goods. Almost without exception, studies find either no significant impact or a significant negative impact of transfers on temptation goods.ct of transfers on temptation goods.”
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/617631468001808739/pdf/WPS6886.pdf

Zambia
“Two unconditional cash transfers implemented by the Government of Zambia show strong protective and productive effects.” 
“Both programs generate large income multipliers, averaging 1.67 across both programs.” “[Economic] Multipliers are generated through investment in non-farm activity in one case, and agricultural output in the other case.” 
“Policy implication is that government sponsored unconditional cash […] can lead to increases in long-term living standards and play an important part of an inclusive growth development strategy.”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387818300105

Worldwide
Found “no systematic evidence that cash transfer programs discourage work.” 
“We re-analyze the data from 7 randomized controlled trials of government-run cash transfer programs in six developing countries throughout the world, and find no systematic evidence that cash transfer programs discourage work.” 
“no effects of transfers on work behavior, either for men or women.” 
“show no evidence—despite claims in the policy debate—that the transfers induce increases in spending on temptation goods, such alcohol and tobacco.”
Mirror: http://ubi.earth/studies/harvard.pdf

Worldwide #2
“165 studies, covering 56 programs” 
“Overall, the evidence confirms that cash transfers can be a powerful policy instrument and highlights the range of potential benefits for beneficiaries. By retrieving, assessing and synthesising the literature on cash transfers over the past 15 years, this review contributes to the growing evidence based on the impacts of cash transfers and provides additional insights into how they work.”
https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/10748.pdf

Other
“[cash-transfers do not] Induce higher spending on alcohol or tobacco” 
“[cash-transfers are not] fully consumed (rather than invested)” 
“[cash-transfers do not] create dependency (reduce participation in productive work)” 
“[cash-transfers do not] increase fertility” 
“[cash-transfers do not] lead to negative community-level economic impacts (including price distortion and inflation)” 
“[cash-transfers are not unable to scale and not] unsustainable.” 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387818300105

Author

Posted

Basic income & cash-transfers do not cause inflation, despite many incorrectly claiming it does. There have been several studies across the world, with varying levels of recipients including a very large-scale program consisting of over 700,000 individuals: the Alaska PFD program. The overall result? Inflation was not observed.

Evidence from Lebanon:
“Cash grants do not cause inflation and do produce significant benefits for local economies. The research found that there are no inflationary impacts from cash distributions.” – UBI Studies Lebanon

Evidence from large-scale gov. unconditional cash transfers in sub-Saharan Africa: “Inflation is a myth”
“Confronting six common perceptions about unconditional cash transfers”.
[The idea that cash-transfers] lead to negative community-level economic impacts (including price distortion and inflation) [is decidedly false].
https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/IWP-2017-06.pdf

Evidence from Kuwait: Inflation observed as reduced
Inflation was observed as reduced after Kuwait gave almost $4,000 to every citizen in 2011. It was called the “Amiri grant”
“Activity in the consumer sector – which has been the backbone of the non-oil sector in recent years – should also remain strong, supported by hikes in benefits, low inflation, and the government’s latest debt relief measure. Solid employment growth has also helped.”
More in-depth reading at: https://www.reddit.com/r/BasicIncome/comments/2ioovd/kuwait_gave_almost_4000_to_every_citizen_in_2011/?st=jabaawj9&sh=dc9d79d5

Evidence from Mexico: Inflation was not observed
“We test two main predictions, first, that cash transfers should lead to price inflation and, second, that prices should fall under in-kind transfers relative to cash transfers. We do not find strong evidence for the first hypothesis.”
Document: https://www.povertyactionlab.org/sites/default/files/publications/467_The-Price-Effect-of-Cash-versus-In-kind-Transfers_July%202017.pdf

Evidence from India: Elasticity of supply would offset inflationary pressure
“Contrary to the skeptics, the grants led to more labor and work (figure 2).” “The positive effect on production and growth means that the elasticity of supply would offset inflationary pressure”
“Those with basic income were more likely to reduce debt and less likely to go into greater debt.” Further reading: http://mondediplo.com/2013/05/04income
Guy Standing http://globaldialogue.isa-sociology.org/indias-great-experiment-the-transformative-potential-of-basic-income-grants/

Evidence from Alaska: Since PFD, lower inflation
“businesses compete for a share of the dividend dollars through advertising campaigns, sales, and other types of special offers.” “demand for public as well as non-profit programs providing services for lower-income individuals and families has also been growing rapidly.” “Alaska has experienced lower levels of inflation compared to the U.S. average since the inception of the program.” http://nation.time.com/2014/02/13/alaska-happiest-state/ “Alaska is consistently among the most equal of all US states, with the lowest rates of poverty, and the highest Well-Being Index scores.”
Further reading: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/04/extreme-wealth-inequality-alaska-model
Original Document: http://www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/Publications/bien_xiii_ak_pfd_lessons.pdf
“Ever since the dividend was introduced, Alaska has had a lower rate of inflation than the rest of the United States.” 
-Scott Santens

Evidence from Prof. John Harvey: 
the inflation formula typically taught in economics class is wrong
“What of the inflation formula typically taught in economics class? In a May 2011 Forbes article titled “Money Growth Does Not Cause Inflation!”, Prof. John Harvey demonstrated that its assumptions are invalid. The formula is “MV = Py,” meaning that when the velocity of money (V) and the quantity of goods sold (y) are constant, adding money (M) must drive up prices (P). But as Harvey pointed out, V and y are not constant. As people have more money to spend (M), more money will change hands (V), and more goods and services will get sold (y). Demand and supply will rise together, keeping prices stable.” by Ellen Brown – https://www.commondreams.org/views/2017/10/04/how-fund-universal-basic-income-without-increasing-taxes-or-inflation

More reading: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johntharvey/2011/05/14/money-growth-does-not-cause-inflation/#1ea11ab742f5

If UBI actually might slightly increase Deflation (instead of Inflation), what does that mean? Deflation also occurs when improvements in production efficiency lower the overall price of goods. Competition in the marketplace often prompts those producers to apply at least some portion of these cost savings into reducing the asking price for their goods. When this happens, consumers pay less for those goods and purchasing power is increased. Deflation allows one to buy more goods and services than before with the same amount of money. Deflation occurred periodically in the U.S. during the 19th century. This deflation was at times caused by technological progress that created significant economic growth. Since deflationary periods disfavor debtors they are often periods of rising populist backlash. Despite all that, and as the studies in this list show, significant inflationary or even deflationary effects of cash-transfers & basic income is not expected.

FAO and UNICEF Findings: No inflation was detected

In 6 case study countries no inflation was detected and cash transferred by the programme yielded profits for local economies http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6460e.pdf – “In fact, cash transfers lead to positive multiplier effects in local economies and significantly boost growth and development in rural areas.”

More reading: http://includeplatform.net/knowledge-portal/cash-transfers-myths-vs-reality/

How Does Government Spending Affect Inflation?
“Little to No Effect on Inflation— Across the board, we found almost no effect of government spending on inflation. For example, in our benchmark specification, we found that a 10 percent increase in government spending led to an 8 basis point decline in inflation. Moreover, the effect is not statistically different from zero.” h/t @owenpoindexter

Further reading: 
https://medium.com/basic-income/wouldnt-unconditional-basic-income-just-cause-massive-inflation-fe71d69f15e7
http://ubi.earth/inflation/

Author